Right so the fact you can disagree with judges means you shouldn't appeal to their authority when you do agree. They're humans, same as us. It's a subjective sport.
You actually made me laugh buddy. So well done. If boxing is your life then learn from the experts like me. There is a reason I am usually right. @Pimp C bet on Garcia no doubt in part due to Bill Haney’s game plan. Why did he think they had to set out to go after Ryan to try and knock him out? The key for Haney to win was to box Garcia and gradually drain him. Never seen a Derrick James fighter not prepared. In boxing the key deliverable is to win not listen to your detractors to make you fight another way than you need to.
Opinions are opinions while facts are facts. Fact is Haney beat Loma by unanimous decision. You are free to disagree with the judges but disagreeing with them does not change the facts or results.
He showed that getting what you want in negotiations is extremely important in outcome of a fight. Floyd taught him well lol.
Yeah won a split decision, so officially he lost on one of the score cards, which you agree with obviously.
Again I remind you, just like I had to the other day, you cannot have it both ways. If you want to quote official scores as an appeal to authority that means you have to respect that authority when it decrees that one official judge felt Floyd lost to Oscar. You have to respect the authority that decrees he scraped a split decision.
I've had more fights than most on this forum and am currently training some fighters so I am an expert myself that is why they call me the Mayor of Aussie boxing. Pimp C is full of baloney you shouldn't be tricked by a fool Honourable Lord President.
