Controversial Opinion: Considering context, Israil Madrimov may be Crawford's toughest Opponent

I seem to recall most here at the time NOT giving him much credit for the Spence win.

 

Crawford whooped that boy. Derrick James had no idea how to effectively blunt TC's offense and had no plan b when Crawford went into another gear. That was the biggest issue Spence had going into the fight.

 

Not controversial at all.

Crawford welter resume:

> past it chinny Khan who also looked small in comparison to the “140lber”
>shot drained Kell Brook who took the fight without his long time trainer Dominic Ingle
> part time boxer/commentator Porter who was winning on the cards. Porters dad threw in the towel to save the money Crawford Spence fight - Porter wasn’t hurt, feet completely in tact
>Spence was shot, inactive (1 fight in 30 months before fighting Crawford) drained to hell and it showed. The fact he looked worse against shot Khan and drained Brook is undeniable evidence that the Spence was not near 100%

 

Ridiculous, Porter was getting beat up. Spence beat Ugas he was still world level. Kell Brook wasn't shot, he was boxing fine until he got clipped

Either you rate Madrimov or you don't. Now give us your prediction

 

What's controversial about that?

An unbeaten Kazakh power puncher who's in the prime of his life and is a title holder in a higher division.

I imagine it will be his toughest opponent.

It's very uncontroversial.

 

Come on you’re so desperate to give boxers credit. Madrimov has had 10 fights come on and who has he beat?

Let’s put it this way Madrimov is not shot, fairly , punches hard, and is a decent boxer. I don’t know who will win, but I’d consider it a better win then the Khan, Brook and Spence Crawford fought

 

You're delusional Madrimov doesn't have a better resume than either Spence. None of them were shot besides Khan, Space was fine, he beat the crap out of Ugas just before despite the car crash, and beat Porter, Garcia, Brook. This isn’t even mentioning that Crawford has more credible wins at weights below 147

So what's really going on is your downplaying all Crawfords wins, and then declare that this guy who has fought "nobody" is his best opponent, because if Crawford does beat Madrimov you'll just say he fought nobody and still is "Crawfords best win", coming full circle.

this is Agenda tactics 101

 

Madrimov is a tougher opponent than the mollusk Spence, who was brutally beaten and outclassed by Crawford...

 

Porter did better than Spence against Crawford

 

Explain how Spence was shot if he beat Ugas by wide decision.

 

That must mean the car crash factor is eliminated because Spence got beat down after Ugas. Errol looked fine until Crawford dropped him for the first time, and made him miss that timing. If something was wrong we don't know what it was

What will you say if Spence beats Sebastian Fundora ?