East Side Boxing Forum

East Side Boxing Forum (http://www.boxingforum24.com/index.php)
-   General Boxing Forum (http://www.boxingforum24.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   new boxing statistic (http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=18801)

jonesjrp4p1 09-26-2007 12:02 PM

new boxing statistic
 
?? thoughts?

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

jsimps 09-26-2007 12:08 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
It's gay and has no value.

mykolakozak 09-26-2007 01:15 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jsimps
It's gay and has no value.

I dont see anything gay in it, but I agree it has little or almost no value. Every boxer fight differently. This takes into account just two things.

brimey 09-26-2007 01:22 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
It has Valuev as a more exciting fighter than Cotto. Enough said.

rendog67 09-26-2007 03:43 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
it is interesting though

jonesjrp4p1 09-26-2007 03:44 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
interesting but wont work

brooklyn1550 09-26-2007 03:56 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
Very bad statistic...

Where is Manny Pacquiao? And what the fuck is Calvin Brock doing above Miguel Cotto or anybody for that matter?

ravtrav 09-26-2007 04:50 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by brooklyn1550
Very bad statistic...

Where is Manny Pacquiao? And what the fuck is Calvin Brock doing above Miguel Cotto or anybody for that matter?

I checked it twice to make sure:huh I guess if you pad your record with nobodies and knock them all out your the man on the "The Tyson Index" ( Edwin Valero's best opponent was 24-1-1 Vicente Mosquera:patsch )

vonBanditos 09-26-2007 04:54 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ravtrav
I checked it twice to make sure:huh I guess if you pad your record with nobodies and knock them all out your the man on the "The Tyson Index" ( Edwin Valero's best opponent was 24-1-1 Vicente Mosquera:patsch )

Still, it can be an interesting, though probably useless, metric. He tries to remove the padding aspect by only using ranked fighters and only the 10 previous fights.

Also remember that his system just tells you how exciting someone is and not how good they are. I don't know if it will work, but it's a novel idea.

jonesjrp4p1 09-26-2007 09:44 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by brooklyn1550
Very bad statistic...

Where is Manny Pacquiao? And what the fuck is Calvin Brock doing above Miguel Cotto or anybody for that matter?

thats what i was thinking.....if they plan on using this they are def. gonna have to tweak the system a little bit

brooklyn1550 09-26-2007 09:44 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonesjrp4p1
thats what i was thinking.....if they plan on using this they are def. gonna have to tweak the system a little bit

:lol: Exactly

o_money 09-26-2007 10:17 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
yeah paul williams is up there. paul williams ain't knocking out shit. or to be more percise the only fighters he could knock out are shit.

bigeddie27 09-26-2007 10:25 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
what a dumb statistic, i started reading it and just closed the window after reading the first sentence.

Dr Gonzo 09-26-2007 10:41 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
stupid article - guys like Pac man should be right at the top but are nowhere to be seen :(

hmi 09-26-2007 11:02 PM

Re: new boxing statistic
 
Interesting article. It needs some twisting though or maybe a lot of twisting. In the end, it will be just an article so that we have something to read. It is supposed to rank the most exciting boxers in the sport but the most exciting boxer, Manny Pacquiao, is not even listed.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013