|
Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
On a scale of 1 to 10, just rate the chances of any of the following heavies you know of of winning a word title, or, just say something informative about them.
|
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Rate the top prospects:
RobertHelenius Kubrat Pulev DennisBoytsov Vyacheslav Glazkov Magomed Abdusalamov How do they relate to American and British prospects? Do you see any of the following being able to compete on their level? Deontay Wilder Tor Hammer Tyson Fury Derrick Chisora Tom Dallas David Price How about these guys with promising records who are unheraleded or seem stuck in the middle? Do any show anything to you to indicate they might make a champion? Alexander Dimitrenko Francesco Pianeta Timur Ibragimov Albert Sosnowski Alexander Ustinov Oleh Platov Neven Pajkic Edmund Gerber Ondrej Pala Andrzej Wawrzyk Mariusz Wach Vladimir Virchis (if he is even still fighting) Yakup Saglam Finally, does anyone know anything about these undefeated heavies in the deep ranks of Boxrec? Jarno Rosberg Lucian Bot Murad Khalidov Vladimir Tereshkin Andreas Gustafsson Arnold Gjergjaj Erkan Teper Krzysztof Zimnoch Jerome Le Banner Nikolay Israelyan Alexey Soloviev Newfel Ouatah Matteo Modugno Janne Katajisto Bogdan Dinu Arild Haugen Dennis Rasmussen Michael Wallisch Sirhei Supronovich Herve Hubeux Leif Larsen |
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Interesting thread :good
I'm interested to read some time frames on when some of these HW will be ready to make a move against tough opposition |
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
from all these guys listed, the only 2 i can imagine as WORLD CHAMPIONS in the future are Vyacheslav Glazkov and Denis Boytsov. They are Young, skilled, fast, exciting and in shape.
|
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Quote:
|
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
I will rate their chances of winning a world title belt before their career is over. None of them are fighting either Klitschko in 2011.
5 star = Ring Magazine Champion, 1 or more world title belts. 4.5 star = Major world title holder, and top 3-4 Ring Magazine Rated 4 star = World title holder, WBC, IBF, WBO, WBA..top 5-7 Ring Mag Rated 3.5 star = Good enough for a regional belt, and possible world belt. 3 star = Will not crack the top 10 in their career. May get a title shot 2.5 star = Will not crack the top 20 in their career, but decent enough 2.0 star = Top 25-50 Box Rec type at best 1.5 star = Will quickly fade after their first or second stoppage loss 1.0 Hype job Example of a 5.0, Wlad or Vitali Klitschko Example of a 4.5 Ruslan Chagaev Example of a 4.0 to 4.5 Sultan Ibragimov Example of a 3.5 to 4.0 Valuev Example of a 3.5. Laun Krasniqui Example of a 3.0 Quote:
Kubrat Pulev 4.0 stars to 4.5, the best of the bunch. Dennis Boytsov 3.5 to 4.0 stars Vyacheslav Glazkov 3.5 to 4.0 stars. Magomed Abdusalamov 2.5 stars Quote:
Tor Hammer 1.5 to 2.0 stars Tyson Fury 2.0 to 2.5 stars Derrick Chisora - Never saw him Tom Dallas - Never saw him David Price - 1.5 stars Quote:
Francesco Pianeta 2.5 stars Timur Ibragimov 2.5 to 3.0 stars Albert Sosnowski 2.0 to 2.5 stars Alexander Ustinov 2.5 stars Oleh Platov 2.0 stars Neven Pajkic - never saw Edmund Gerber - 1.5 stars Ondrej Pala 2.0 stars Andrzej Wawrzyk 2.0 to 2.5 stars Mariusz Wach 2.0 to 2.5 stars Vladimir Virchis (if he is even still fighting) 3.5 Yakup Saglam -Never saw |
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Quote:
This is an aewsome response! :good I appreciate the time you put in. You don't think Dimintrenko looked a little better with the jab in his last outing? I still kind of hope the guy becomes a major player, although I admit it is wishful thinking. |
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Quote:
I would give Povetkin a 3.5 to 4.0, and Adamek a 3.5 |
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Quote:
|
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
I like Pulev, there moving him quick but with 25 fights he can be a danger. It depends on how he develops
|
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Quote:
|
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Quote:
You gave more points Pulev than Helenius. Helenius has been sparring more dominant fighter as i know, but otherwise good job:deal |
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Quote:
|
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Quote:
|
Re: Rate the Chances of these European Heavies
Quote:
I do think Pulev has much better speed, and better athleticism and skills in comparison to Helenius. Pulev at 6'4" 1/2 is a big man too. Helenius is a little stiff, but my guess hits harder and take the better punch in comparison to Pulev. Glalzkov is only 6'3", but I think he takes the best punch of the three, hits a little harder than Pulev, and is quicker than Helenius. As an Amateur, Glazkov was the highest rated of the three. Who is the best man? Hard to say for now! I don't think Pulev, Helenius, or Glazkov are going to be aces capable of trumping the deck, but each of them has the potential to become a king once the Klitschko's are gone. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013