East Side Boxing Forum

East Side Boxing Forum (http://www.boxingforum24.com/index.php)
-   Classic Boxing Forum (http://www.boxingforum24.com/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum (http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=4329)

Cobra33 07-07-2007 07:36 PM

Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum
 
Two old school boxers in a head to head match-up.Who wins and why?

hopkinsfan07 07-07-2007 09:33 PM

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum
 
Hopkins by a clear UD 9-3 - 10-2 rounds for hopkins

Robbi 07-07-2007 09:50 PM

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hopkinsfan07
Hopkins by a clear UD 9-3 - 10-2 rounds for hopkins

No problems with your opinion, but not sure Hopkins had the tools to clearly beat McCallum by scores of 118-110/117-111.

The only claim for Hopkins clearly beating McCallum in anyway shape or form, knockout. And that aint happening, make no mistake about it. McCallum arguably had a better chin than anyone Hopkins has fought to date.

I pick Hopkins to pull out a decision 115-113.

rekcutnevets 07-07-2007 10:01 PM

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum
 
In agreement with Robbi here.

mcvey 07-08-2007 06:21 AM

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobra33
Two old school boxers in a head to head match-up.Who wins and why?

McCallum is the more skilled imo but Hopkins is naturally bigger and stronger so Id go with him by Dec.

Robbi 07-08-2007 10:08 PM

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum
 
McCallum was clearly not at his prime when fighting Watson, Graham, and Toney at 160lbs.

But he was a damn finely tuned and accomplished middleweight who performed extremely well in the divison, with many observers having him outpointing Toney.

achillesthegreat 07-09-2007 07:59 AM

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum
 
Hopkins was a touch bigger, a touch stronger, more comfortable at 160. Plus I think he is a little more technically correct. Plus he is naturally more tricky and I think this may lure McCallum into Bernards fight rather than vica versa.

I'd say Hopkins UD!

Duodenum 07-09-2007 04:10 PM

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum
 
This is not to disrespect B-Hop in any way, but I am intractably predjuiced in favor of boxers with a 15 round pedigree, which B-Hop lacks, through no fault of his own. Nonetheless, Mike does have a championship rounds background (15 complete against Mannion, 13 against Minchillo), and available tale of the tape measurements indicate that Mike has a reach advantage on Hopkins as well. Taking into account the fine performer B-Hop is, I see the outcome as being:

McCallum SD 15 Hopkins

achillesthegreat 07-09-2007 05:01 PM

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum
 
X could do 15 no problem. X is one of the modern fighters who I have no doubt could do 15. He wouldn't suddenly just get tired in the 13th round.

Duodenum 07-09-2007 06:46 PM

Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Mike Mccallum
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by achillesthegreat
X could do 15 no problem. X is one of the modern fighters who I have no doubt could do 15. He wouldn't suddenly just get tired in the 13th round.

Hence, my SD posit. (If the 15 round limit had never been abolished, B-Hop's current record would stand at 51-2.) Even Duran respects X.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013