![]() |
Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Broner just moved up a division and beat the top guy with ease.
It's laughable that all these people here are complaining. What has Froch done other than lose to Ward, Dirrell and Kessler? Since when do fighters get props for losing? |
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
If we're using this logic, then why is Broner ranked over Froch seeing as he lost to PDL?
|
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Quote:
Who of relevance did Froch beat at the age of 23? |
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Wins over Pascal, Taylor, Dirrel, Abraham, Johnson, Bute shit all over anything Broner has acomplished. No shame in losing to Ward who you can argue is the best fighter in the world at the moment.
|
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Homo troll thread
|
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Imma beat yo an yo mommas ass
|
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
You seem purely ignorant.
|
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Pascal - who had he beaten at that stage
Taylor - shot fighter, who hadn't done anything significant at 168. Also he still schooled Froch for 11 rounds haha. That's like saying Khan should get credit for beating Judah. Dirrell - green fighter... who had he beaten at that stage Johnson - old, ancient fighter Bute - best win was against someone Carl Froch already murdered Abraham - his best win at 168 was over a shot fighter that Carl Froch had already knocked out Who else? Robin Reid - haha! Let's face it, this guy is good but overrated. |
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Quote:
Step you game up flower and do a bit of research. Your thread is balderdash and I hope it's not an indication of your boxing knowledge. |
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Quote:
|
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Quote:
|
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
:lol: Nuthuggers taking this all to heart I see
|
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Quote:
Froch lost to Ward and Kessler, Carl Froch SD12 Andre Dirrell. Plenty of fighters get props for losing when they take on top competition, no one at 160-175 would get close to beating Ward at the minute so no shame in that, and the fight with Kessler was a war. Quote:
Taylor- Beat Jeff Lacy in a WBC eliminator (No big deal I know but still not that bad) Dirrell- Think he proved against Froch that he is very tough to beat. Johnson- Yusaf Mack and Allen Green in his last three bouts. Bute- As much as I think he was protected and felt although Froch would win that bout he was far from favorite and Bute was regarded as #2 in the division. Abraham- Was still regarded as a power puncher, made Dirrell visit Dr.Shawhi Stop twisting shit to fit your agenda, the most legit thing you could have posted is that a two division champion should be ranked above a one division champion, however to say that you would have to rate Ricky Burns as high as Broner, now if you think they deserve to be rated the same fair enough Broner > Froch, however if you are going to say Broner > Burns the only way you can do that is by saying Broner has fought a higher standard of competition which would therefore make Froch > Broner. |
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
Quote:
|
Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
W Bute
W Pascal W Abraham W Johnson W Taylor W Magee W Mack W Dirrell L Ward L Kessler OR W DeMarco W Litzau W Escobedo W Perez W Rodriguez W Ponce de Leon You tell me which set of career fights is worthy of higher ranking. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013