East Side Boxing Forum

East Side Boxing Forum (http://www.boxingforum24.com/index.php)
-   General Boxing Forum (http://www.boxingforum24.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple. (http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=444353)

Dedication 11-20-2012 04:35 PM

Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Broner just moved up a division and beat the top guy with ease.

It's laughable that all these people here are complaining.

What has Froch done other than lose to Ward, Dirrell and Kessler?

Since when do fighters get props for losing?

orriray59 11-20-2012 04:44 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
If we're using this logic, then why is Broner ranked over Froch seeing as he lost to PDL?

Dedication 11-20-2012 04:49 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orriray59 (Post 14241153)
If we're using this logic, then why is Broner ranked over Froch seeing as he lost to PDL?

Broner did not lose to Ponce De Leon

Who of relevance did Froch beat at the age of 23?

mick557 11-20-2012 04:55 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Wins over Pascal, Taylor, Dirrel, Abraham, Johnson, Bute shit all over anything Broner has acomplished. No shame in losing to Ward who you can argue is the best fighter in the world at the moment.

TheJuggernaut 11-20-2012 04:57 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Homo troll thread

Post Box 11-20-2012 04:58 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Imma beat yo an yo mommas ass

Post Box 11-20-2012 05:00 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
You seem purely ignorant.

Dedication 11-20-2012 05:02 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Pascal - who had he beaten at that stage

Taylor - shot fighter, who hadn't done anything significant at 168. Also he still schooled Froch for 11 rounds haha. That's like saying Khan should get credit for beating Judah.

Dirrell - green fighter... who had he beaten at that stage

Johnson - old, ancient fighter

Bute - best win was against someone Carl Froch already murdered

Abraham - his best win at 168 was over a shot fighter that Carl Froch had already knocked out

Who else?

Robin Reid - haha!

Let's face it, this guy is good but overrated.

PityTheFool 11-20-2012 05:06 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dedication (Post 14241189)
Broner did not lose to Ponce De Leon

Who of relevance did Froch beat at the age of 23?

He was still an amateur at 23.:lol:

Step you game up flower and do a bit of research.

Your thread is balderdash and I hope it's not an indication of your boxing knowledge.

Two Shakes 11-20-2012 05:07 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dedication (Post 14241090)
Broner just moved up a division and beat the top guy with ease.

It's laughable that all these people here are complaining.

What has Froch done other than lose to Ward, Dirrell and Kessler?

Since when do fighters get props for losing?

I think you sleep in the same bed as your sister.

Post Box 11-20-2012 05:09 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dedication (Post 14241090)
Broner just moved up a division and beat the top guy with ease.

It's laughable that all these people here are complaining.

What has Froch done other than lose to Ward, Dirrell and Kessler?

Since when do fighters get props for losing?

I think I sleep in the same bed as your sister.

Dedication 11-20-2012 05:11 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
:lol: Nuthuggers taking this all to heart I see

Elliot 11-20-2012 05:26 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dedication (Post 14241090)
Broner just moved up a division and beat the top guy with ease.

It's laughable that all these people here are complaining.

What has Froch done other than lose to Ward, Dirrell and Kessler?

Since when do fighters get props for losing?

DeMarco was the top guy according to?

Froch lost to Ward and Kessler, Carl Froch SD12 Andre Dirrell.

Plenty of fighters get props for losing when they take on top competition, no one at 160-175 would get close to beating Ward at the minute so no shame in that, and the fight with Kessler was a war.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dedication (Post 14241282)
Pascal - who had he beaten at that stage

Taylor - shot fighter, who hadn't done anything significant at 168. Also he still schooled Froch for 11 rounds haha. That's like saying Khan should get credit for beating Judah.

Dirrell - green fighter... who had he beaten at that stage

Johnson - old, ancient fighter

Bute - best win was against someone Carl Froch already murdered

Abraham - his best win at 168 was over a shot fighter that Carl Froch had already knocked out

Who else?

Robin Reid - haha!

Let's face it, this guy is good but overrated.

Pascal- Nobody great, but then again who between losing to Froch and beating Dawson (I'd be very surprised if you didn't have on your P4P list before the Ward fight) did he beat who was worth mentioning?

Taylor- Beat Jeff Lacy in a WBC eliminator (No big deal I know but still not that bad)

Dirrell- Think he proved against Froch that he is very tough to beat.

Johnson- Yusaf Mack and Allen Green in his last three bouts.

Bute- As much as I think he was protected and felt although Froch would win that bout he was far from favorite and Bute was regarded as #2 in the division.

Abraham- Was still regarded as a power puncher, made Dirrell visit Dr.Shawhi

Stop twisting shit to fit your agenda, the most legit thing you could have posted is that a two division champion should be ranked above a one division champion, however to say that you would have to rate Ricky Burns as high as Broner, now if you think they deserve to be rated the same fair enough Broner > Froch, however if you are going to say Broner > Burns the only way you can do that is by saying Broner has fought a higher standard of competition which would therefore make Froch > Broner.

Lance_Uppercut 11-20-2012 05:28 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dedication (Post 14241189)
Broner did not lose to Ponce De Leon

Who of relevance did Froch beat at the age of 23?

WTF does this even matter? Didn't know there was a race to the best record at 23. FFS...fanboys and their crying about some fake list like the P4P list...

Nonito Smoak 11-20-2012 05:30 PM

Re: Why are people complaining? Broner over Froch, it's simple.
 
W Bute
W Pascal
W Abraham
W Johnson
W Taylor
W Magee
W Mack
W Dirrell
L Ward
L Kessler

OR

W DeMarco
W Litzau
W Escobedo
W Perez
W Rodriguez
W Ponce de Leon

You tell me which set of career fights is worthy of higher ranking.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013