![]() |
Oganov V Echols is off.
anyone know why?
|
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
It would be good to see Sam to fight Echols....Sams work rate against Echols bombs...who will win....I will say..Sam. If Iam wrong and Echols Ko'es Sam then thats an interesting result.
|
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
Quote:
|
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
How much talk can be produced about 1 fighter with such little action ceases to amaze me.
What Organov needs to do is have some fights and beat some top 50 fighters before all this talk from himself and his management. |
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
we talk about him alot because he is an exciting prospect - we wanna know where he is heading etc etc - whats your problem with that? its a forum after all
|
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
Quote:
Using Gav's own words is Nievas even top 50.:huh |
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
Quote:
|
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
Hey Gav, hows it going? Long time no hear.
You reckon Mundine should enter the ring against Nevadis wearing grey trunks with a white horizontal and vertical stripe, along with grey boots, and grey gloves with 2 thin white stripes going across the fist part? He should also enter the ring with a grey cape with white text reading "THE MAN" and it should cast a small slightly greyer shadow. :D |
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
Nievas is rated 44. Mundine fought at least 5 top 50 fighters before Ottke: McLeod, Bargero, Masua, Soliman and Waters, and that was only after 10 fights, not 26, and then he did actualy fight Ottke rather than just talking about it.
Mundine backs up his talk, he has a go. |
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
Quote:
|
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
Quote:
OK Gav......Back up your big talk........ Apart from Green and Ottke.....NAME ONE OTHER HALFWAY DECENT BOXER THAT MUNDINE HAS FOUGHT BY CHOICE! Lets's go through the list.... OTTKE.......Mundine honestly thought that the featherfisted Ottke couldn't hurt him, so he had a go. GREEN........ It was all about the money.......worth the risk. ECHOLS ........ Mandatory fight for the WBA "regular" Title, ordered by the WBA.........NO OTHER OPTION!:deal SIACA........ Mandatory defence of his "regular"WBA Title.........NO OTHER OPTION:deal KESSLER....... Mundine was Kessler's "Mandatory"....... NO OTHER OPTION:deal SOLIMAN........ Again.......A "Mandatory" fight for the "regular" Title, ordered by the WBA.......NO OTHER OPTION:deal And then there was........ Fuck me......That's it.........That's the whole fucking list of halfway decent boxers that Mundine has fought.:roll: There were extenuating circumstances for Green and Ottke......... But History tells us that Mundine is not going to put his arse on the line unless there is no available option. In his whole fucking career he has only fought 2 decent boxers by choice.......... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: More recently.......THE MAN :patsch has knocked back the chance to fight Kessler for a real World Title........not once......BUT TWICE :scaredas: Now tell me again Gav.........How he has a go.:D |
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
because he could have vacated rather than fight his dangerous mandatory
|
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
Quote:
He's good with the mouth.....but not that good.:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl I only post this info coz a lot of posters aren't as aware of the history of these fights and the political bullshit behind the scenes......... That.........and I like to piss off the nuthuggers a little.:D |
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
Quote:
|
Re: Oganov V Echols is off.
echols though showing heart to last the 10 today is shot.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013