View Single Post
Old 08-10-2011, 06:49 PM   #774
PH|LLA
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YUL
Posts: 38,158
vCash: 5685
Default Re: Is Floyd or manny more versatile?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdsfinest22 View Post
Bazooka that would defeat the point of the actual "sport"...

the point is to hit and not get hit..

IF you have the SKILL to hit the guy W/OUT getting hit then your "playing the game right"

IS A RUNNING BACK GONNA RUN AWAY FROM THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE AND LOSE YARDS SO HE CAN MAKE IT MORE INTERESTING OR EXCITING OR WHATEVER WE WANNA CALL IT??

I DONT THINK SO CUZ THE POINT OF THE SPORT IS TO MOVE FORWARD..

JUST AS THE POINT OF BOXING IS TO HIT AND NOT GET HIT...

I see what your saying and I SEE THE POINT YOUR TRYING TO MAKE..

Problem is that it goes against "the object of the game"
See it from another point of view.

Floyd doesn't wanna brawl cause he's thinking "I can land 4 punches on this guy and he only lands 1 on me, I'm winning this fight easy."

Pac wants to brawl cause he's thinking "I can land 20 punches on this guy and he lands 5 on me, I'm winning this fight easy."

So both ways work. Even if Floyd only gets hit once, he only hits his opponent 4 times. Pac gets hit 5 times, but he is hitting his opponent with 20 punches. And he knows he can dish it out better than anyone else.

Pac has no reason NOT to brawl. But sometimes he doesn't do it cause he can win either way. Pac can go toe to toe with anyone in the sport. He can also outbox a whole shitload of people. Floyd can't really go toe to toe with fighters who are good at it.
PH|LLA is offline  Top
Reply With Quote