East Side Boxing Forum - View Single Post

thistle1 · 10-18-2011, 03:12 PM

Woodcock was much better than some here are thinking, look at a couple of the ealier posts!

I understand SuzieQ, I like Haye and had faith in him, I really thought he could pull off an upset against Klit (because the Klits aren't great either), still believe he could.

But that No Show he gave is only beaten in pathetic performance by the last 5-6 years of Hopkins!

Woodcock's period was simply better, the times demanded it, even though the British and Euro HWs weren't great, some of them were good enough. Woodcock being one of them!

10-18-2011, 03:12 PM	#36
thistle1 Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 3,231 vCash: 1000	Re: Bruce Woodcock v David Haye Woodcock was much better than some here are thinking, look at a couple of the ealier posts! I understand SuzieQ, I like Haye and had faith in him, I really thought he could pull off an upset against Klit (because the Klits aren't great either), still believe he could. But that No Show he gave is only beaten in pathetic performance by the last 5-6 years of Hopkins! Woodcock's period was simply better, the times demanded it, even though the British and Euro HWs weren't great, some of them were good enough. Woodcock being one of them!
Top