Originally Posted by Cellz831
is exactly what pacfags are saying. please stop with the pacquiao excuses. mayweather is older than pacquiao and ur a fool if u think hes still in his prime. some of u say that pacquiao has slowed down, got old, and is washed up now. i didnt see any difference in pacquiaos speed, stregnth, stamina, or style when he fought marquez.
he fought a SMART boxer. of course pacquiao is gonna look great against a slow brawler that comes straight at u like margarito aka a punching bag. u pactards fell into the hype and got a reality check.
why is it so hard to believe that marquez who had 2 other contrevesial fights with pacquiao wouldnt be able to compete this time? did y'all really believe that "new fighter" that has a "right hand" bullshit lol.
honestly, it sounds ur already makin excuses for pacquiao if he loses to mayweather and alot of y'all are afraid to eat your words.
if not? prove me wrong. Tell me exactly what has changed in pacquiao from now to pre-marquez fight(de la hoya, hatton, cotto, margarito)
I'm pretty neutral in this, for once I prefer Floyd as a boxer. He's obviously more eager to make the fight now after the Mosley and JMM fights. For me Pac has slowed down and Floyd should've fought him after the Cotto match to cement his top tier ATG status. Now he is going to get a lot less credit. As Borjia pointed out Pac has different style. Look a fighter like Vargas was shot in his mid twenties. Floyd could fight like Hop in his 40s and still be effective. You speak about the Pactards but you are like them you see only one side of the story