To say the truth, I think those 'ratings' are silly anyway. Why spread silly knowledge like that.
There are more interesting things in the Ring. Like we could have posted here monthly ratings from the issues we have. I have about a hundred Ring magazines myself, half of them from 1940-1960's and the other half 1981-1991, and I wanted to scan their rating for myself (so I don't have to browse through the magazines every time), anyway.