Originally Posted by renyo
Really? Back to 07.. Do some current work man...
Pac has obviously grown tremendously as a star, while Floyd had hit his plateau.. I understand the posturing and going back so far to suit certain needs'...
The only thing that matters is current money... Got it chief...
It's not where you were, it's where your e at..
Do this with the last two years and you got something.. Otherwise you might as well go back to when Pac sold cigarettes on the corner..
Are you talking about the discounting method I used or the period in which the data begins?
If the former, it doesn't matter what time base year you use, and if the latter, it actually helps Pacquiao's case. (Not only that, in the past 2 years only like 4 fights have been done which is way too few to reduce any volatility)