Originally Posted by sud2002
But you do agree it was a better 8 than Froch's?
As for the performances the argument was about the quality of opponents not the result/performance, so things like performances or the fact that Hatton was over matched is irrelevant.
I think the summary of opponents is unfair, they were better than you have suggested. Sometimes Pacquiao's achievements is his downfall.
Surely that's the same thing?!