I've only seen Gibbons been dominated by Dempsey. Sharkey was skilled but inconsistent, he usually bested smaller men but ofcourse Walker took him to a draw so could Gibbons? Perhaps
I do think at his best Sharkey would be able to impose his size
Originally Posted by McGrain
Whilst I think Gibbons was all round better than Sharkey, probably, I think that Sharkey might have his number in the same sort of way that Taylor (kind of) had Hopkins.
An odd comparison, do you consider him to have athletic advantages rather than just size and strength on him?