Originally Posted by salty trunks
Regardless of Phil Jacksons top 10 rating He was a manufactured contender who had little skills and really had no business in the top ten. Like many fighters placed in the top ten by Don King he quickly faded away. Some guys like John Ruiz actually proved their merit Jackson was never any good second and third chance.
-I stated the facts. He was an undefeated fighter whom Ring magazine placed in their top 10. He was thought of as a good prospect, if you need an analogy think of him as a Dimitrenko of the early 90s. Ruddock gave him a good trashing and looked pretty good doing so. Ruined fighters don't look good trashing undefeated ranked fighters. Its probably Ruddock's best wins of the 90s, alongside Dokes.