View Single Post
Old 07-23-2012, 12:08 PM   #51
The Mongoose
I honor my bets
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 11,237
vCash: 75
Default Re: Razor Ruddock vs Rid**** Bowe + question

Quote:
Originally Posted by salty trunks View Post
The ****ogy is looking great against **** fighters is meaningless.
McNeely and Jackson weren't ****.

And looking great agaisnt sub par competition is what Ruddock and Tyson made a career of, unforunately. Now when they started looking average against sub par competition and there was evidence of badly diminished abilities, than we can start talking about fighters being "ruined"

A ruined fighter is "****". If you are ****, you are going to look like ****, even if its against other ****.

And if beating Jackson in the usual manner he beat overmatched opponents isn't evidence Ruddock was still capable for you, than you are going to have provide evidence that Ruddock was ruined.

Last edited by The Mongoose; 07-23-2012 at 12:24 PM.
The Mongoose is offline  Top
Reply With Quote