Originally Posted by salty trunks
The ****ogy is looking great against **** fighters is meaningless.
McNeely and Jackson weren't ****.
And looking great agaisnt sub par competition is what Ruddock and Tyson made a career of, unforunately. Now when they started looking average against sub par competition and there was evidence of badly diminished abilities, than we can start talking about fighters being "ruined"
A ruined fighter is "****". If you are ****, you are going to look like ****, even if its against other ****.
And if beating Jackson in the usual manner he beat overmatched opponents isn't evidence Ruddock was still capable for you, than you are going to have provide evidence that Ruddock was ruined.