Originally Posted by KuRuPT
Am I understanding this correctly...
Patterson.. Folley.. Machen, Williams and Marshall... were better regarded in their time than Langford, McVea, Joe J, Burns, Ketchell, Jeffries, Jackson and O'Brien.. In THEIR TIME not with Seamus colored glasses that only regard modern boxers as counting.. This must be a joke.
In THEIR TIME Langford and Ketchell were middleweights , Jeffries was old and post retirement and layoff , Joe J I counted , Jackson (like Thompkins ?) was less than a full fledged middleweight and d rest were either old , small , some other handicap or probably a combination of more than 1 handicap come fight time .
Your post show how clueless u r .
As usual .