View Single Post
Old 08-03-2012, 05:09 PM   #18
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,115
vCash: 685
Default Re: Langford's ranking at LHW

Originally Posted by lufcrazy View Post
That's entirely consistent!

a 200lb man beating a 174 man is a hw fight.
a 174lb man beating a 161lb man is a lhw fight.

If the opponents are great fighter's, it's a great victory.

So a 200 lb man is a heavyweight, but a 180lb man is a light heavyweight?

And a a 170lb man beating a 200lb man is a heavyweight.

but if a 170lb man beats a 180lb man he is a heavyweight.

what happens if a 160lb man beats a 170lb man? is he a light heavyweight? But if he beat a 180lb man he is a heavyeight?

and if the opponent is great then the opponent is great, unless he weighs over 175 in which case he is of no relevance.

This ranking system is getting crazier and crazier. Though sometimes i think Frakenfrank uses a similar system which dents to give it more credibility
Boilermaker is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links