East Side Boxing Forum - View Single Post - Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

lufcrazy · 08-03-2012, 05:42 PM

I don't buy this sliding business, am I missing something here?

is it beyiond the realm of possibility that he had just infact "dipped" and would come back to form for a championship bout?

08-03-2012, 05:42 PM	#13
lufcrazy requiescat in pace East Side VIP Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: England, Up North Posts: 22,723 vCash: 330	Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title. I don't buy this sliding business, am I missing something here? is it beyiond the realm of possibility that he had just infact "dipped" and would come back to form for a championship bout?
Top