View Single Post
Old 08-05-2012, 04:19 AM   #37
ESB 2002 Club
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: By any means necessary
Posts: 17,817
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Does Jon Jones have the best GnP in MMA history?

Originally Posted by Kittikasem View Post
Yeah I don't really understand how the discussion turned to Jones at hw. Not relevant to this thread really. Can't believe I'm kind of on the same page as Haggis here.

For what it's worth, I'd say Tito enjoyed size advantages in his time at lhw as well. He was often just a bigger, heavier guy than the average lhw contender. Tito is very big compared to Kondo, Tanner and even Wanderlei.
I'm fairly certain you possess more reading comprehension that Wikiboy. Note i'm talking about GnP here. I made that VERY clear in my post.
This is a discussion primarily about JJ's apparent GnP. That much is abundantly clear from the thread title hence my response. As is usually the case in discussion they evolve as we use similes and comparisons to elaborate on our points. Hence why i mentioned JJs effectiveness up at heavy as at some stage it is mooted he will move there. If his GnP is that good then surely it should translate to heavy.
Likewise I bought up Tito to illustrate why he became infamous for his Gnp, and what effective GnP should look like. Head to head Jones doesn't measure up when compared with the best guys out there who employed GnP as a major part of their skillset.
I wouldn't expect wikiboy to understand that as he's obviously not seen the fights, likes to rankle points for the sake of a circular argument, whilst subtracting his own re****ed interpretation of what i said. I'm not expecting that of you even though you do have a habit of writing essays on semantics.
scurlaruntings is offline  Top
Reply With Quote