View Single Post
Old 08-17-2012, 08:59 PM   #22
Hookie
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chambersburg, PA
Posts: 2,482
vCash: 500
Default Re: What is Holmes would have got to 50-0?

Quote:
Originally Posted by luke View Post
Holmes vs Tyson 86-87

tyson would have always beat holmes, his power jab is not a good weapon against tyson, if you use a power jab you have to take a step towards your opponent, and if you miss your one step closer to them, and you will be open on one side, and maybe off balance, i think holmes whole style is wrong for tyson.
I disagree that Tyson would beat Holmes prime vs. prime but opinions are like assholes... and most of them stink.

Anyway, about Holmes "power jab"... Holmes jab was never a weakness and it wouldn't be a weakness vs. Tyson. Oh wait, they did fight in '88... was it the Holmes power jab that helped Tyson win?

Look, Holmes knew how to throw a proper jab. His jab was hard, fast, accurate, and steady. He defended counters well and he was rarely off balance after throwing it until well into his 40's.
Hookie is offline  Top
Reply With Quote