Originally Posted by PowerPuncher
Charles was significantly heavier than Conn and bigger master boxers usually beat smaller master boxers. Is it right Conn was 167 against Louis, that would make Charles 15-20lbs heavier
Walcott was a master boxer, but he had a tedency to fight defensivley, which did not apeal to the judges of the period. Conn was the kind of technician, who tended to aply pressure, and smother defensive fighters.
I have a feeling that this might just work here.