East Side Boxing Forum - View Single Post - Is David Haye one of the worst "unified' Champs ever?

UnleashtheFURY · 10-02-2012, 08:08 PM

Haye wasn't even a real champion. His WBA title was paper championship.... Seriously, Fuck the WBA. Chagaev beat Valuev for his WBA title, and Wlad beat Chagaev.. for some reason the WBA makes it a "non title fight" and Wlad doesn't win the title, then they vacate it and give it back to Valuev.... then Haye beats him and becomes "champion". As far as i'm concerned Wlad became WBA champ when he beat Chagaev. So if you ask me, Haye was never a real champion. Haye was as much of a champion as Povetkin is today.

10-02-2012, 08:08 PM	#10
UnleashtheFURY Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 1,749 vCash: 500	Re: Is David Haye one of the worst "unified' Champs ever? Haye wasn't even a real champion. His WBA title was paper championship.... Seriously, Fuck the WBA. Chagaev beat Valuev for his WBA title, and Wlad beat Chagaev.. for some reason the WBA makes it a "non title fight" and Wlad doesn't win the title, then they vacate it and give it back to Valuev.... then Haye beats him and becomes "champion". As far as i'm concerned Wlad became WBA champ when he beat Chagaev. So if you ask me, Haye was never a real champion. Haye was as much of a champion as Povetkin is today.
Top