This thread was a success
Originally Posted by Nonito Smoak
However much weight one puts on either arguments explains why they feel the way they do when comparing eras of the past to recent ones.
So you believe that the ATG boxers from the past who fought very regularly could have reached a higher level of in ring performance given more time and specifics in a training camp. But what made them so great was their familiarity with a boxing ring, and this allowed them to reach the level of performance they did. That's fair enough.
Have I got that right?