Originally Posted by mr. magoo
Rating the quality of a victory based on what the opposition " went on " to do is irrelevant. What counts is what the win was worth at the time.
And that's a bullshit argument.
That's like saying Jones' win over Hopkins is worse than Rigo's win over Rico Ramos because Rigo beat the more established fighter.
If a fighter falls apart after a loss that's one thing, but a win can gain value in hindsight.
I'm guessing you're a fan of Foreman to suggest that.