Originally Posted by luke
i never said he was inactive for 10 years prior to the moorer fight, its evident to anyone with a brain that he wasnt
he was inactive for 10 years, i think you need to brush up on your boxing, boxrec will help you do this, your lucky it was me you said that to, im one of the nicer and better boxing historians.
You said he was inactive 10 years before the Moorer fight. If you read that statement through my eyes and other eyes, it would come off like he went into that fight with a 10 year layoff. That's how I read it because that's how it sounded.
The correct thing to say would have been, "it's impressive because he was inactive for 10 years and mounted a comeback later".
Me brush up on boxing? LOL. I called your post out because it seemed like you were the one misinformed. I've known about the whole Moorer-Foreman story since I was in high school. Which was nearly a decade ago.