Originally Posted by kmac
i like the revisionist history here.
the writers and other fighters of the time knew how good johnson was. that's why he was considered a top 5 fighter for a while. johnson was clearly considered a level above the other flyweights at that time.
He didn't fight anyone in the top 3! Think for yourself and look at the evidence. The magazines were biased.
How the **** can you be in the top 5 P4P if you're not the no.1 in your division?!