Thread: Haye v Dempsey
View Single Post
Old 11-04-2012, 09:32 AM   #134
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 19,218
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Haye v Dempsey

Originally Posted by lufcrazy View Post
I disagree. He unified the cw division and established himself as the best available challenger to wlad. He came up short but I would expect the same could be said for the vast majority of heavyweights.
Did he really unify the cw division ? He beat two of the titlists. He didn't fight the IBF champion. He didn't do much to establish himself as the best available challenger for Wlad - I mean, he was not a stand-out challenger in pure fighting terms. He was just the latest in a long line of undistinguished challengers. He established himself as a big payday. He held the WBA title - but so did Valuev, and Ruiz. He was just successor to those old relics. Wlad should have had that WBA belt anyway, since beating Chagaev, but the WBA have some funny rules.
Unforgiven is offline  Top
Reply With Quote