Originally Posted by Stonehands89
....while lufcrazy goes with his best guess.
it's how boxing is today.
we have 4 or 5 claimants per division and these are ranked by objective people.
if Robinson v Bell is good enough, I see nor fair basis to demand 1 v 2 as the only relevant way to fill what you call a vacant crown.
In short, I don't view your lineal title above any of the others. I believe the man makes the belt, now more so than ever before. I would love their to be just one belt with prestige that everyone fought for, but that doesn't mean we can rewrite history.