Originally Posted by JAB5239
Nearly ripping a mans face off is very convincing in my opinion. And if making Vittles miss to the point of injury and quitting wasn't convincing enough Vits should have sought a rematch and tried to redeem himself. And the WBC means ****, son. Vittles had ONE defense as champion and than retired to avoid Rahman. His resume sucks.....deal with it!
It's not convincing at all. It's simply lucky to cut someones face like that. Vitali did much worse to Briggs and his face wasn't cut up like that. Hell, Vitali punched and hit Lewis much more and Lewis did not have the cuts Vitali had. So no, it isn't convincing. He didn't retire to avoid Rahman but it was because of his injuries (nice attempt at trolling there). Anyway, he has made countless defenses and has dominated the entire division.
And if you're wondering why Vitali didn't face Byrd again it's because he refused just like your boy Lewis.