View Single Post
Old 11-14-2012, 04:56 PM   #45
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,387
vCash: 500
Default Re: lennox's resume is hardly better than wlad's

Originally Posted by paypayvay View Post
seriously , lennox fans are always talking about how " this era sucks " as if lewis fought in the golden age of boxing , let's examine the 90's :

-fossils from the 70's and early 80's were still in contention for the title ( Tony Tucker , george foreman )
-bruce seldon was a world champion
-frank bruno was a world champion
-françois botha was a world champion
-the scary light heavyweight Michael Moorer was a multiple times world champion
-Shannon Briggs was the man to beat for the lineal title

and even in that weak era, lennox managed to get KTFO'd twice by limited / one-trick ponied opponents when he was regarded as the number 1 heavyweight in the world and held major titles .

other than limited opponents and two washed up names , who did he beat ?

>>>>TKO 6 was his best win , and it's the only reason he should be ranked " slightly " above wlad .
I hate this kind of argumentation. Let's say you're a fan of A and I'm a fan of B. I'll talk about all the negative things about A and you'll talk about all the negatives things about B. We'll never reach an agreement this way.
Brownies is offline  Top
Reply With Quote