View Single Post
Old 11-15-2012, 04:52 PM   #35
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,235
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Should Vitali end Haye's career?

Originally Posted by Meow View Post
I feel like I'm talking to some child that can't wrap his head around a basic point and then tries to turn into something else. It's lucky to get cut, not to intend damage. I don't know how you pulled that out of your ass but stop doing it because the concept I'm trying to explain to you is very easy to understand. I know that it makes your entire argument wrong but that's the whole point.
You have to be a complete fool to think ANY fighter is not trying to do damage everytime he punches and that is exactly what happened and exactly why it was not lucky.

It does matter that Vitali is older than Briggs. It shows that Vitali is past his prime too but I don't get how Vitali being the 2nd best HW really matters to your point. Yes Vitali is the 1st/2nd best because he's is that great of a boxer but he still is past his prime just like Briggs was. Basically both were past their primes but Vitali still destroyed Briggs with complete ease while Lewis was on ***** street in the 1st round and the fight would have went the full 12 if the ref never prematurely stopped it. And again, Briggs said that Vitali was better than Lewis. Along with the Vitali-Lewis fight, it shows that Vitali is just better than Lewis.
Neing the second best heavyweight shows he hasn't fallen off because the comp is so bad. And if Vittles handles Briggs with complete ease he should have been able to stop him. You know what shows me Vits isn't better than Lewis? The FACT that Lewis stopped him while he was at his worst and Vittles at his best.

Byrd was ducking Vitali. Vitali was champ of the world for years while Byrd was a nobody. There was no point of a rematch, everyone knows a 1 armed Vitali still beat the living hell out of Byrd and only lost because of the shoulder.
Byrd was ducking Vitaly after coming to Germany on 10 days notice and making him quit and than twice fighting the much better brother. Yeah that makes sense. The point of a rematch was Vittles lost, was being backed up by a guy he towered over and significantly outweighed, because the German fans, his fans were cheering Byrd and he promised them he'd het his belt back. And if Byrd was a nobody than why was he ranked 10th in 2000 while Vits was unranked, 3rd in 2001 while Vits was unranked and two on 2002 while Vots was 7th and 2nd in 2003 while Vits was ranked 1? Seems to me Byrd was there the whole time and Vittles did everything in his power to avoid fighting the man who made him quit again.
JAB5239 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote