Originally Posted by Ulver
Dan Rafael routinely steals material from other boxing writers and passes it off as his own. I've seen the evidence on more than a few occasions. He lifts sentences and paragraphs almost verbatim.
That right there is enough to view him as a scumbag.
He also loves to dish it out, but has super thin skin himself and can't take any criticism.
He also is biased, like when he says as he did on Friday that David Haye "doesn't deserve the shot or the payday" against Vitali. This even though Haye did what they asked of him and beat Chisora. So Charr and Briggs did deserve the title shot?
He may get some inside info, though he has grown lazy and gets less of that then he used to. But overall, Rafael is a scumbag.
Pretty much sums it up for me.