Originally Posted by Royal-T-Bag
ok instead of being bitter faggots that are mad about Broner taking over boxing, how bout you tell me why Broner beat a better version of Demarco with greater ease, throwing less punches and actually knocing him down?? Also why don't you tell me what Valero does better than Broner? Valero never did shit but KO a buncha tomato cans. most overrated fighter ever, he woulda got picked apart by the likes of Marquez or Broner- he was one dimensional and his best win just got one upped by a 23 year old. boom
So...because Pac beat Hatton better than Mayweather did, that means Pac is better than Floyd? Your logic holds no weight.
Broner has good skills. But here are some things that makes Valero dangerous and serve as the right tools to knock Broner out: volume punching, underrated footwork, speed, power, heart, iron chin, good stamina, and probably his best asset: hunger.
You're not looking at Valero's talent. You're going by numbers or what you see in the record books and that's not always the whole story. Even before Broner became a champ any real boxing fan can see he has great talent. Valero was NOT one dimensional. He's not as polished or technically sound as Broner but he had what it took to knock anyone out. Pacquiao once had crude (but special) tools and look how far that got him.