Originally Posted by platnumpapi
valero was a wild fighter, pacman before he fought jmm is what valero reminded me of. he was good fighter but to compare him to boxer like broner was always some dumb ****. they asked that question many of times on different sites. could broner beat demarco worse then valero did ? the answer is yes but now you will here valero ruined him and demarco was a chump. its funny how you read one thing before the fight and something different in the next fight. broner can fight and box, he dont have to run, has power and speed and a smart fighter in the ring. late them hate, the hated on floyd and it would not be right if they aint hate on broner as well.
valero was wild yes. but he was surprisingly good with his feet, and when he wanted to be, hard to hit. he was also intimidating as ****. Made his last 2 opponents quit on their stool, he had that fear factor. I loved the way he looped his hooks, made them look like they could reach round any guard.