Originally Posted by Uncle Rico
You can be forgiven for thinking that Ė seeing as though he beat Demarco in more devastating fashion. But that argument hold little weight. Itís like saying Pac >> Mayweather because he beat Cotto and Hatton more impressively.
And if I remember correctly, Valero, despite taking longer to break him down, gave Demarco far less success than what Broner did. He also wasnít very aggressive that night; opting to box more than he usually does.
Demarco was also green as hell when he faced Valero. Broner beat a far more confident and better Demarco who was fresh off a destruction over Molina. I would liken it to the Broner who faced PDL vs this version.