View Single Post
Old 11-20-2012, 02:10 AM   #60
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,841
vCash: 1090
Default Re: Broner> the overrated Valero

Originally Posted by Royal-T-Bag View Post
It's now undeniable that Broner is a better fighter than Valero. Much more rounded, just as powerful (maybe moreso considering he took out Demarco quicker with less punches and actually dropped him), just as quick, far better defensively, physically stronger, equal chin, better infighter.... You name it, at 22 Broner just surpassed Valero's career best win and did it in more impressive fashion vs a better more seasoned version of Demarco.

I would love to see Broner dismantle Rios in his first fight at 140 after decimating Burns in a few rounds. Rios would get beaten so badly especially after Broner proved he's got an inside game, what could Rios possibly do? Funny how before the fight Demarco was considered the best LW by many and people were saying he was gonna give him a tough fight and now he's being written off as bum hahaha Broners one of those guys that some people will never give him credit no matter what they'll always look for ways to discredit him on his inevitable rise to face of boxing and the upper echelon of the P4P list.
Dude, you're ****ing weird. You can't mention any fighter without mentioning Valero. What's up with that?
bernie4366 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote