Originally Posted by PityTheFool
We'll agree to disagree then Jeff.But I think Ricky's as legitimate a champion at 135 as you'll get.His title resume is at least the equal of Vasquez and I freely admit Broner is the big name but I don't think Ricky should be viewed as a nonentity,which saying he'd be correctly slaughtered if he'd said it would suggest.
Can you name a conceivable advantage Burns has over Broner as far as who should travel?
Broner has the undefeated record, Burns has 2 losses to nobodies.
Broner lives in the capital of the boxing world, Burns doesn't.
Broner has big KO power at 84% KO rate, Burns is feather fisted at 27%.
Broner has the youth at 23, Burns is already 29 and hasn't done a whole lot.
Broner just moved up in weight and destroyed the #1 guy in the division to take the title, Burns has the...WBO title.
Broner has superstar potential, Burns seems destined for domestic level fights.
This thread is boring now.