Originally Posted by lufcrazy
Why should the white champion be held in greater esteem than the black champion? especially when that black champion has beaten better men than the white champion.
The point is moot, two champs who didn't fight each other. Neither was undisputed.
Yeah like I said, call him the champ all you want during Hollywood but it's just a notional title that's worhtless.
This is bollocks, imo.
Just as you stress that "alphabet" titles are today usually meaningful
in so far as they are usually the titles that all the fighters are competing for, then Dempsey's title was the only meaningful title in his day.
No one designated it "the white championship". In fact, it was the same championship that Jack Johnson had held (and lost - to the man Dempsey was to beat).
The "colored championship" was actually quite a demeaning title, and shouldn't been much to a truly ambitious black fighter such as Wills or his management. They knew
Dempsey was the champion. In fact, isn't that what the issue is ?
Dempsey was champion. Wills the most deserving challenger. That's where the controversy lies, isn't it ?