View Single Post
Old 11-24-2012, 02:56 PM   #38
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 1,402
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Bernard Hopkins - How great?

Originally Posted by ushvinder View Post
So what, he still took fights at higher weight. People love to give **** to modern fighters if they dont move up in weight, but we just let Hagler slide. Hagler NEVER beat a great middleweight, i doubt hagler would have fought Roy Jones, he knows he would lose.
Moving up and fighting Tarver, Pavlik etc isn't nearly the same as moving up to fight Qawi or Spinks mate. Hopkins could have moved up earlier to chase a rematch with Jones if he wanted but I suspect he knew that he would've no more luck than he did first time around (where he didn't do too badly all things considered).

Regarding the 'modern fighters get **** for not moving up', I'd say it was the other way around: most of today's guys get flack for too much weight jumping and not cleaning divisions out. It isn't the be all and end all really.

I've no great love for Hagler either, superb though he was.
Tin_Ribs is offline  Top
Reply With Quote