Originally Posted by Quincy K
ill tell you that i bet on berto last night and you are correct that guerrero illegally held berto while punching him that created the first knockdown and helped change the direction of the fight.
ill also tell you so what?
this is the hurt business and not ****ing checkers. it was clearly obvious that berto did not come into the first round or this fight for that matter in a war mode.
he was initially sparring with robert whereas guerrero was fighting.
and before andre knew it he was way behind on the cards.
the fault of this is either poor management, berto himself or a combination of both.
robert guerrero did what he had to do to win the fight and andre berto did not. and know because fo the beating that he sustained he lost a few fights out of his career...whatever is left of it.
and andre berto has no one to blame but himself.
And what was the point of your diatribe? This thread has to do with poor refereeing, right? Is it not a referee's job to enforce the rules? I mean, if it's not, let me know.