Re: Hatton's Career v Froch's Career who wins?
I think Hatton is pretty underrated generally but I'd have Froch ahead.
Hatton's tenure as 140lb champion wasn't that great, I'd reckon that Carl's stint as a titlist over a similar period edges Ricky.
Any of Froch's wins over the four year period, with the possible exception of Mack, are better than Maussa or Lazcano, though Hatton has the best individual win of the two.
As for defeats, Carl lost a fight that really he should have won, and another in which he was pretty much shut out from the first bell to the last, something that never really happened to Hatton. But equally Froch hasn't ever been executed in brutal fashion, and made to look like a complete turd in the process.