Originally Posted by janitor
OK, so he sure as hell might have a resume as good as Marvin Hart then.
Witherspoon has a better resume than Hart.
Who do you think that the best contenders of the period were?
If not them, then who?
I don't know whether they were the best or not.
I am quite happy to accept that they were the best around .
But I'd like to know how and why Corbett (0 wins in 6 years) could be among the top contenders ?
here with their knowledge of boxing should be able to see that there's something wrong with that picture.
Also, the fact that Jeffries struggled somewhat with these older, smaller, often inactive opponents should
be open to criticism.
It's okay saying he beat everyone around, but look who was around and look how he performed against them.