Originally Posted by puga_ni_nana
what's more laughable is some certain set of fan group claiming that cotto was shot/damaged goods after margo when some of them even picked cotto to win over pac and recently had to abandon their shot cotto theory when their boy is fighting cotto around 3 years and a few more wars later.
yeah the same cotto without the ****ines. and if you notice, cotto tends to be more defensive depends on the level of his opponents. his impetousness leads to his defeat against margo same case with pac.
No his lack of stamina was to blame for his fight with Margarito. With may weather IMO was his lack of aggression. Whith pacquiao he lost because pacquiao had the style and skills to be beat him. Don't get me wrong even if cotto was in his prime I think PAC would still win. But cotto was not the same fighter he was before Margarito. If he was more defensive against better competition why was he less aggressive against Jennings. He was completely different. With Mosley he wasn't as defensive as he was with jennings.