View Single Post
Old 12-06-2012, 02:34 AM   #261
JeanPaulValley
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Crescent Heights,Hell
Posts: 2,373
vCash: 438
Default Re: Best cherry pickers of all time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by McGrain View Post
No, I want you to back up what you say. It's natural, and it's a standard the board holds every single member to. Remarks like this:



Are utterly pathatic.



I was totally non-plussed, but I certainly wasn't upset. Your'e a troll. I'm ripping you up. If you'd posted actual sources in support of your bizarre position it would have been bad for me. I was happy you ****ed up again.

To be clear, you claimed that there were "lots of people", stressing journalists, who were out there who felt the same way you did. You've claimed that "Lennox Lewis only fought two prime contenders". I would be astonished to see that in print from a respected source. You've claimed that Golota "was a mental patient". I'd be amazed to see that backed up in black and white by a known boxing source. I would, howver, also be interested to see it.

So your failure to provide links supporting them, although unsurprising, was dissappointing, I admit.



What questions?



And think about how many rate him very highly. Here's Cox, who had him in the top 10 as early as '05:

http://coxscorner.tripod.com/20heavyweights.html

Or how about SportsRatings who have him at #8?

http://www.sports-ratings.com/fights...ak-rating.html

Google "Boxing Scene Top 25 Heavyweights" and you will see he is at #9 on their list.

ESB's Classic poll has him at #5

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/...d.php?t=156253


What you are doing, rather pathetically, is saying that because you've read some writers who think he is overated (although you've failed to provide any links, I believe you) that it is a fact. Some writers think he's overated. Some think he is not. Some think he is underated. This is a difference of opinion not a mandate for you to spam this forum.



I think they have valid opinions. Why are you confusing my opinion of there viewpoint with yours? Many fo theirs are valid. Yours are very obviusly ridiculous:



Are you ****ing retarded? How can you call a two-time HW champion of the world a joke? "A joke of a career"? What do you make of Gary Mason's career? If Lewis, #1 HW in the world for an extended period by most sources is "a joke", what is a guy like Glen Johnson to you?




Fine. He could have looked more spectacular. To me, there are 14 elite HW's, as long as Lewis is ranked among them (and he almost certainly does) I think that's absolutely fine. What you won't see is this guy saying his career is "a joke" he was "the greatest cherry picker of all time" and that "he only fought two prime contenders". You won't find him saying these things because he is not a troll/idiot like you are. I have absolutely no problem with what he said.



I disagree with this. It's an extreme point of view. Lewis outside the top 20 is unacceptable to me, it seems ridiculous. I disagree with this guy strongly.

No doubt you would disagree strongly with the linked lists that have him top 10.



But this is a different level. I can't believe you are comparing yourself to bixing writers with your bizarre opinions. You're trolling hard, boy:
Anyone who mentions this glass chin cherry picking platypus in the top 10 is on crack bro! Lummox is the most nondescript champion ever.

Lummox is on par with Valuev only a bit more lucky.

Lummox Derives from Scots dialect: A lummox is a large, gangly, lanky and useless waste of space. A poor excuse for a human being. Lummox, A large, dimwitted, lumbering oaf of a person lacking tact, intellectual prowess, and manual dexterity. As such, this  creature is unable to get out of it's own way.

It's true too because many writers said that if Lummox didn't have a problem he would "create one" and his footwork was worse than Bambi on ice.
JeanPaulValley is offline  Top
Reply With Quote