Originally Posted by knockout artist
Tyson's win over Holmes means very little
. Anyone arguing otherwise is a fool. If he beat a 1981 prime Larry Holmes
that would have been an amazing achievement. Beating the fat old coming out of retirement for a payday Holmes doesn't mean you beat an ATG
dino - Holmes jab may be better than Wlad's, but there isn't much between them. Wlad's jab is certainly not 'massively inferior'.
That hilarious coming from a Calzaghe nuthugger.
Wlad uses his jab like he's knocking on the door.