Originally Posted by knockout artist
Tyson's win over Holmes means very little. Anyone arguing otherwise is a fool. If he beat a 1981 prime Larry Holmes that would have been an amazing achievement. Beating the fat old coming out of retirement for a payday Holmes doesn't mean you beat an ATG
dino - Holmes jab may be better than Wlad's, but there isn't much between them. Wlad's jab is certainly not 'massively inferior'.
Tyson's win over fat 3 year retired Holmes is Tyson's best win. It's sad that this is all Tyson fans have to try and prove their boy is an ATG....a win over a fat guy who had been retired for 3 years after two losses.