Originally Posted by dinovelvet
knockout artist, as always your post is a complete joke.
You're telling it how it is are you? You haven't a clue what you're talking about.
Holmes against Holyfield was older, slower and weighed MORE than he did against Tyson.
For Tyson he trained hader than he ever did before. He was popping off his jab and moving as effectively has he had always done. He was not fat or unfit. Holmes wasn't the problem , Tyson being unbeatable was the problem.
There are full time trolls on this forum that are better posters than you.
tyson never has been unbeatable..his prime consists of an old great and guys who got threw into the ring with him...when he stepped it up he lost..FACT..