Originally Posted by Leftsmash
Counter arguement? The only part you continue to repeat is his win over a past his best Sturm that ended up down to a SD (For the record I had it 115-113 Sturm). Sturm managed to look prime against Zbik but his other 2 fights preceding that he seemed to be floundering, Zbik was actually just shit, that's why he looked prime and that's what you and the rest of them cling onto.
Oh, I bet you had it 115-113 to Sturm. So instead of accepting the high probability that Murray and Macklin (who gave Martinez a tough fight) are good top 10 middleweights who gave Sturm trouble due to their styles, you decide to think that Sturm at the age of 33 (
) is "past his best" because it goes with your ridiculous thought that Geale is a average boxer? You truly don't have a clue what your talking about. I'd bet my house that if it was either an American middleweight or the hypejob that you would be one of the first to to ride their dick.