Originally Posted by TheManBearPig
Oh, I bet you had it 115-113 to Sturm. So instead of accepting the high probability that Murray and Macklin (who gave Martinez a tough fight) are good top 10 middleweights who gave Sturm trouble due to their styles, you decide to think that Sturm at the age of 33 (
) is "past his best" because it goes with your ridiculous thought that Geale is a average boxer
? You truly don't have a clue what your talking about. I'd bet my house that if it was either an American middleweight or the hypejob that you would be one of the first to to ride their dick.
You keep going around in ciricles with this one, theres no other arguement from yourself as to how Geale is better or would have a decent chance against Golovkin aside from the overated wins you have listed and over reliance on Sturm as the golden achievement.
And yes call me ridiculous, I believe Geale has talent, but average fighter? Definitely.